No one has yet argued for votes for whales and dolphins. But considering some of the politicians who manage to get themselves chosen by human electorates, maybe it would not be such a bad idea.
Should whales be afforded the same inalienable civil rights as humans? Some academics find the idea compelling.

economist.com

123 notes

Show

  1. tokihadaremomatanai reblogged this from theeconomist
  2. vihara79 reblogged this from theeconomist
  3. ithoughttheysaidrum reblogged this from theeconomist
  4. thedailyeli reblogged this from theeconomist
  5. powershe3 reblogged this from theeconomist
  6. pegobry reblogged this from theeconomist
  7. salibonani reblogged this from theeconomist
  8. ironladyisfe reblogged this from theeconomist
  9. ayvanyay reblogged this from theeconomist
  10. never-surrender-to-the-world reblogged this from theeconomist
  11. therealsaisai reblogged this from theeconomist and added:
    The Economist picks the pithy closer for its Tumblr quote post, but the article is really quite interesting. I’d be...
  12. jamescfemmer reblogged this from eclectick
  13. eclectick reblogged this from theeconomist
  14. wizardblue reblogged this from theeconomist
  15. astudyinazul reblogged this from theeconomist
  16. masteravnishcpatel reblogged this from theeconomist
  17. pod313 reblogged this from theeconomist
  18. clicheaspirations reblogged this from theeconomist
  19. warmdintherays reblogged this from theeconomist
  20. sunbeamsfromcucumbers reblogged this from theeconomist
  21. libre-sollus reblogged this from theeconomist