No one has yet argued for votes for whales and dolphins. But considering some of the politicians who manage to get themselves chosen by human electorates, maybe it would not be such a bad idea.
Should whales be afforded the same inalienable civil rights as humans? Some academics find the idea compelling.

economist.com

125 notes

Show

  1. blogbourse reblogged this from theeconomist
  2. live-sport reblogged this from theeconomist
  3. bigfinance reblogged this from theeconomist
  4. grand-travel reblogged this from theeconomist
  5. decoration-maison-interieur reblogged this from theeconomist
  6. tokihadaremomatanai reblogged this from theeconomist
  7. vihara79 reblogged this from theeconomist
  8. heather-writes reblogged this from theeconomist
  9. thedailyeli reblogged this from theeconomist
  10. powershe3 reblogged this from theeconomist
  11. pegobry reblogged this from theeconomist
  12. salibonani reblogged this from theeconomist
  13. ironladyisfe reblogged this from theeconomist
  14. ayvanyay reblogged this from theeconomist
  15. stephencallen reblogged this from theeconomist
  16. therealsaisai reblogged this from theeconomist and added:
    The Economist picks the pithy closer for its Tumblr quote post, but the article is really quite interesting. I’d be...
  17. jamescfemmer reblogged this from eclectick
  18. eclectick reblogged this from theeconomist
  19. wizardblue reblogged this from theeconomist
  20. zazapahtuh reblogged this from theeconomist
  21. masteravnishcpatel reblogged this from theeconomist